Seminar 15:
Renaissance Tragedy as a Mirror to Disintegration of Social and Moral Values
Marta Gibińska (Krakow)
TOPIC DESCRIPTION
The seminar’s topic addresses three renaissance tragedies: The Jew of Malta, The Merchant of Venice, and the Duchess of Malfi as a specific mirror(s) set up to the Tudor society on the one hand, and a possible mirror applicable to our contemporary social scene. The historical ‘truth’ may be available only as a partial reconstruction based on our knowledge and understanding of the political, economic, and ideological factors responsible for social processes and constraints.
LITERATURE
The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Humanism, ed. Jill Kraye, 1996:
“Humanists and the Bible” by Alastair Hamilton
“Humanism and the Origins of the Modern Political Thought” by James Hankins
The Cambridge Companion to English Renaissance Drama, eds A. R. Braunmuller and M. Hattaway, 1999:
“The Arts of the dramatist” by A.R, Braunmuller,pp.53-90
“Drama and society” by M. Hattaway, pp. 91-126
“Political Drama” by Margot Heinemann, pp.161-206.
A Companion to Shakespeare , ed. David Scott Kastan 2000:
“Shakespeare and the ‘Element’ he lived in” by David Scott Kastan, pp.3-8
“Shakespeare’s England” by Norman Jones, pp.25-42
“Religious Identities in Shakespeare’s England” by Peter Lake,pp.57-84
“The Family and the Households” by Susan Duyer Amussen, pp. 85-99
“Shakespeare and Political Thought” by Martin Dzelzainis, pp. 100 - 116
“Political Culture” by David Harris Sacks, pp. 117 - 138
Also:
A Companion to English Renaissance Literature and Culture, ed. M. Hattaway;2003
Part Two: “Contexts and Perspectives”, pp. 13 - 164
Jonathan Dollimore, Radical Tragedy, The Harvester Press 1984, Chapter I, “Contexts”, pp. 3-25
Jonathan Dollimore, Alan Sinfield, eds., Political Shakespeare: new essays in cultural materialism, Manchester University Press 1985; Part I: “Recovering History”, pp.1-129
Pierre Bourdieu: Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture 1990
The Social Structures of Economy 2005
Zygmunt Bauman: Consumerism and the New Poor 1998
Life in Fragments. Essays on Postmodern Morality 1995
City of Fears, City of Hopes 2003, available at www. Gold.ac.uk/media.city
SCHEDULE
Session 1: Discussion and analysis of the dramatic conventions, the space (all three plays are located far away from England), the choice of characters, their social and racial positions, family relations, etc., as the elements of the fictional worlds’ social and moral profiles. All three plays will be the discussed.
Relevant readings:
“The Arts of the dramatist” by A.R, Braunmuller,pp.53-90
“Drama and society” by M. Hattaway, pp. 91-126
“Political Drama” by Margot Heinemann, pp.161-206.
A Companion to Shakespeare , ed. David Scott Kastan 2000:
“Shakespeare and the ‘Element’ he lived in” by David Scott Kastan, pp.3-8
“Shakespeare’s England” by Norman Jones, pp.25-42
“Religious Identities in Shakespeare’s England” by Peter Lake,pp.57-84
“The Family and the Households” by Susan Duyer Amussen, pp. 85-99
“Shakespeare and Political Thought” by Martin Dzelzainis, pp. 100 - 116
“Political Culture” by David Harris Sacks, pp. 117 - 138
Session 2: The analyses of the three plays will be referred to and studied in the context of the Tudor and our contemporary societies and scales of values. The expectation at the outcome of the session is formulation of possible modern application of the fictional worlds in a short paper (up to 300 words).
Relevant readings:
A Companion to English Renaissance Literature and Culture, ed. M. Hattaway;2003
Part Two: “Contexts and Perspectives”, pp. 13 - 164
Jonathan Dollimore, Radical Tragedy, The Harvester Press 1984, Chapter I, “Contexts”, pp. 3-25
Jonathan Dollimore, Alan Sinfield, eds., Political Shakespeare: new essays in cultural materialism, Manchester University Press 1985; Part I: “Recovering History”, pp.1-129
Pierre Bourdieu: Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture 1990
The Social Structures of Economy 2005
Zygmunt Bauman: Consumerism and the New Poor 1998
Life in Fragments. Essays on Postmodern Morality 1995
City of Fears, City of Hopes 2003, available at www. Gold.ac.uk/media.city
Session 3: The final presentation as the outcome of the seminar will be discussed.
Students can work on, e.g.,
1.a staging relevant to contemporary social and/or moral problems;
2. A critical review of an imaginary theatre production;
3. An introduction to a modern edition;
4. A university lecture.
ASSESSMENT
The first seminar grade expresses the activity in the seminar discussion. It can range from 0 to 10, the pass limit is 5. The second seminar grade assesses the quality of paper proposals (300 words minimum), the share of the student in the preparation of the final presentation, its contents and standard. It can range from 0 to 15, the pass limit is 8. The final essay grade is expressed in points from 0 to 30, the pass limit is 15. Deadline for the submission of the essay: 15 July 2013. Length of the essay: 3000-4000 words. The maximum number of points acquired for the 2 seminars and an essay is 80 (25+25+30).
For the participation in a workshop 5 points are acquired (10 points for two workshops). For the the submission of an internship application 5 points are acquired and 10 points fort the shortlisting for the internship.
